Your prospecting plan should fit on one page

A prospecting plan is a set of decisions, not a schedule

The reason this matters is that activity lists cannot fail informatively. If you commit to thirty emails a day and pipeline does not appear, you have learned nothing except that thirty was not enough. So next quarter it becomes fifty, and you burn your domain and your enthusiasm at the same time.

A plan made of decisions fails usefully. If you decided to work sixty accounts in one vertical through one channel and it produced nothing, you know something specific: that vertical, that channel, that message. You can change one thing and run it again.

I have made the activity-list mistake more than once, most memorably in a growth role where I had a beautiful tracking spreadsheet and absolutely no theory about why anyone should reply. The spreadsheet was green all week. The pipeline was empty.

Write down who you are not going to contact

Start here, because it is the decision everybody skips and the one that does the most work.

Say you sell a scheduling tool to clinics. The tempting version of your target list is "healthcare". The useful version is "private physiotherapy and podiatry practices in the UK with two to six practitioners, where the owner still treats patients". That second one tells you the persona is a clinician not an administrator, that they read email in the evening, that they have no procurement process, and that "saves your receptionist four hours a week" is a better line than anything about compliance.

Then write the exclusions explicitly. NHS trusts, no. Anything over twenty practitioners, no. Chains, no. Not because those are bad businesses but because they buy differently and you cannot serve two buying processes with one sequence while you are one person.

The exclusion list is what stops you drifting. Without it, by week three you will be emailing a hospital group because someone connected on LinkedIn and it felt like progress.

Work out how many accounts you can genuinely carry

Take the number of accounts you think you can work properly in a week, then halve it. That is closer to true.

Working an account properly means reading their site, finding a real reason to be in touch, writing something that could only have been sent to them, and following up four or five times over a few weeks. That is fifteen or twenty minutes per account minimum, and it does not scale by being more organised about it.

Most reps carry a list four times longer than they can do this with, so they default to the template, and the template gets the reply rate the template deserves. Fewer accounts done properly beats more accounts done badly, every time, and it is a much easier thing to fix on a Monday morning.

Pick one channel and give it a real run

Pick one, and give it at least six weeks.

Running email and calls and LinkedIn simultaneously feels thorough and makes your results unreadable. When something works you will not know which part worked, and when nothing works you will not know which part to fix. Pick the channel your buyer actually lives in, commit to it, and add the second channel only once the first one has a number attached to it.

The prospecting process side of this matters too, but the channel decision comes first and constrains everything else on the page.

Decide in advance what happens after the first no

This is the line almost nobody writes down, and it is where most pipeline quietly leaks.

Someone replies "not right now". What happens? If the answer is "I will remember", the answer is that they disappear. Write the rule instead: not-right-now goes into a ninety-day nurture with a specific reason to return, and the reason is written at the time while you still remember the conversation. Wrong-person replies get one question asking who owns it, then close. No reply after five touches gets a six-month gap, then a fresh angle, not the same sequence again.

Three lines. They will do more for your numbers than any subject line experiment.

The whole plan fits in about 150 words

Something like this, written out properly:

> We are targeting UK private physio and podiatry practices with two to six practitioners where the owner still treats. Not NHS, not chains, not over twenty practitioners. Sixty accounts this quarter, fifteen live at a time. Channel is email only until 31 October, five touches over three weeks, first touch references something specific from their site. Hypothesis: they lose evenings to rescheduling and will pay to stop. Not-now goes to a ninety-day list with a written reason. Wrong-person gets one referral ask then closes. Reviewing on 31 October against meetings booked, not emails sent.

That is a prospecting plan. Everything else is your CRM's job.

If you want the longer version, with the segment and message thinking spelled out at length, I have written that up separately as a sales prospecting plan.

Where prospecting plans quietly fall apart

The plan gets you the meeting. Then you send the follow-up, the deck, the proposal, the one-pager they asked for. And the plan has nothing to say about what happens next, because everyone treats the send as the finish line.

It is the least controlled moment in the whole thing. Your document lands in an inbox, gets skimmed on a phone between two other meetings, and gets forwarded to someone who was not on the call and has no idea what the context was.

That gap is why I built LiveDocument. You attach a recorded walkthrough to a PDF or an image, send it as one link, and see which pages held attention and which got skipped. It does not tell you who to prospect and it will not write your sequence. It just means the document you fought to get in front of someone arrives with your voice on it rather than sitting there mute.

Worth adding one line to your plan for it: what you send after the meeting, and how you will know it was read.

FAQ